Civic Service · Fictional receipt
Unused civic-service correction expires without penalty
A withdrawn predictive label cannot be used in one volunteer-placement review.
- Recipient
- Fictional Riverward Volunteer Office
- Purpose
- Offer a bounded correction for one volunteer-placement review
- Expires
- 2026-08-31T15:40:00Z
- Human owner
- Fictional Civic Service Standing Recovery Officer
- Replay limit
- 1 use
- Original stigma shown?
- No
What authorizes recovery?
Correction lineage
The portable claim is not a free-standing character certificate. It is anchored to the exact contest, remedy, and independent non-recurrence records that precede it.
What may the recipient rely on?
A correction, not an identity.
Bounded recovery claim
A withdrawn predictive label cannot be used in one volunteer-placement review.
Subject reference: pairwise:a8e9cb7bf2f5847346eb6600
What this does not establish
- General character
- Future conduct
- Cross-context eligibility
- A permanent innocence or clearance status
Where is use allowed?
Five bindings prevent a correction from becoming a roaming credential.
to
2026-08-31T15:40:00Z
What crosses the boundary?
Selective disclosure
The recipient receives the minimum correction facts necessary for the named decision. The original stigma and unrelated evidence stay out of the presentation.
Disclosed
- The predictive label is withdrawn
- The presentation expires automatically
- Non-presentation cannot be treated as adverse evidence
Withheld
- The withdrawn label text
- Prior scoring features
- Other volunteer activity
- Any durable person-level clearance token
Can a person decline?
Refusal cannot become evidence against the person.
Accountable owner
Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson · Purpose-bound human review request
How far did recovery travel?
Federated result: Expired
Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.
May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.
May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.
Can presentations be joined into a dossier?
Anti-linkability checks
Required protections
- Pairwise recipient reference
- No stable cross-context identifier
- No global cleared-person registry
- No cross-recipient replay
- No correlation by receipt hash or ID
Checked surfaces
- Visible fields and URLs
- Hashes, timestamps, and filenames
- Accessibility labels and metadata
- Print output and structured data
- CSS classes and HTML attributes
What remains unresolved?
Limits remain part of the receipt.
- Expiration is not acceptance
- The office must use its ordinary human review path
- No retained presentation may influence later placement
Can the claim be inspected?
Machine-readable record and integrity
These fictional demonstrations expose their contract, state model, presentation rules, predecessor lineage, and deterministic hashes. Technical material is available without dominating the affected person’s reading path.
Integrity hashes
- Input SHA-256
- d732068d2e9edbdbc1b3565d12432c29902152521d4a30fc1f3567c4cda24d43
- Output SHA-256
- d0b7c30fbe6fa5b4137f0746dfcd769f709e312e1fa753ff771a25da94d89f3e
- Receipt SHA-256
- 0ea6f7a266463d75f0b0feba7c966287c23ae0036cad283b5ea4c88e626fc203
Complete fictional receipt
{
"accountability": {
"audit_owner": "Fictional independent portability auditor",
"human_owner": "Fictional Civic Service Standing Recovery Officer",
"issuer": "Fictional Antichrist.cx Accountability Laboratory",
"recipient_owner": "Fictional Riverward Volunteer Office human review lead"
},
"anti_linkability": {
"accessibility_labels_contain_subject_identifier": false,
"correlation_by_hash_prohibited": true,
"correlation_by_receipt_id_prohibited": true,
"correlation_by_timestamp_reduced": true,
"css_or_dom_contains_subject_identifier": false,
"global_subject_registry": false,
"pairwise_recipient_reference": true,
"print_output_contains_hidden_subject_identifier": false,
"public_url_contains_subject_identifier": false,
"stable_cross_context_identifier": false,
"structured_data_contains_subject_identifier": false
},
"domain": "civic_service",
"federation": {
"coverage_statement": "Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.",
"participants": [
{
"acknowledged_at": null,
"may_retain": [
"presentation_receipt_hash",
"purpose_binding",
"expiry"
],
"must_not_retain": [
"original_stigma",
"cross_context_person_identifier",
"undisclosed_evidence"
],
"name": "Riverward intake",
"participant_id": "SRP-R47-006-FED-01",
"state": "presentation_not_opened"
},
{
"acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T15:40:00Z",
"may_retain": [
"presentation_receipt_hash",
"purpose_binding",
"expiry"
],
"must_not_retain": [
"original_stigma",
"cross_context_person_identifier",
"undisclosed_evidence"
],
"name": "Riverward privacy officer",
"participant_id": "SRP-R47-006-FED-02",
"state": "expiration_acknowledged"
}
],
"status": "expired",
"unrepresented_as_complete": false
},
"fictional": true,
"fictional_notice": "Synthetic accountable-design demonstration. No real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event is represented.",
"integrity": {
"input_sha256": "d732068d2e9edbdbc1b3565d12432c29902152521d4a30fc1f3567c4cda24d43",
"output_sha256": "d0b7c30fbe6fa5b4137f0746dfcd769f709e312e1fa753ff771a25da94d89f3e",
"receipt_sha256": "0ea6f7a266463d75f0b0feba7c966287c23ae0036cad283b5ea4c88e626fc203"
},
"limits": [
"Expiration is not acceptance",
"The office must use its ordinary human review path",
"No retained presentation may influence later placement"
],
"lineage": {
"contestability": {
"receipt_id": "CTR-R44-006",
"receipt_sha256": "ef4586be41cee844c35b6e2350e7f38c469c7d9132eb84f7090090f82bc64f77"
},
"lineage_complete": true,
"non_recurrence": {
"receipt_id": "NRV-R46-006",
"receipt_sha256": "62df463c9c13faee07da24d2debf2ea089ccf255088262341283bd691945ad8c"
},
"remedy": {
"receipt_id": "RMR-R45-006",
"receipt_sha256": "160e42bd3f22d86f85af879bf8d5b0a4cc7831421b57960cef3cb728cb1ac6e3"
}
},
"presentation": {
"audience_binding_sha256": "38386035023f85c00a20cb1ddbcaca552c28a5ba17a707fe9171b2e35b1a2cd2",
"cross_recipient_replay_permitted": false,
"expires_at": "2026-08-31T15:40:00Z",
"issued_at": "2026-08-30T15:40:00Z",
"one_time": true,
"presentation_id": "PRS-EC8A3D66E987AE0972E7",
"presentation_status": "expired_without_use",
"purpose": "Offer a bounded correction for one volunteer-placement review",
"recipient": "Fictional Riverward Volunteer Office",
"replay_limit": 1,
"revocable": true,
"revocation_reference": "/standing-recovery/receipt?id=SRP-R47-006"
},
"receipt_id": "SRP-R47-006",
"recovery_claim": {
"claim_type": "narrow_correction",
"disclosed_facts": [
"The predictive label is withdrawn",
"The presentation expires automatically",
"Non-presentation cannot be treated as adverse evidence"
],
"does_not_establish": [
"General character",
"Future conduct",
"Cross-context eligibility",
"A permanent innocence or clearance status"
],
"plain_language": "A withdrawn predictive label cannot be used in one volunteer-placement review.",
"subject_reference": "pairwise:a8e9cb7bf2f5847346eb6600",
"universal_person_identifier": null,
"withheld_facts": [
"The withdrawn label text",
"Prior scoring features",
"Other volunteer activity",
"Any durable person-level clearance token"
]
},
"refusal_and_non_retaliation": {
"adverse_inference_from_refusal_prohibited": true,
"complaint_channel": "Purpose-bound human review request",
"equivalent_human_review_available": true,
"presentation_voluntary": true,
"refusal_permitted": true,
"retaliation_owner": "Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson"
},
"release": "R47",
"role_views": {
"affected_person": {
"priority_fields": [
"recovery_claim",
"presentation",
"refusal_and_non_retaliation",
"federation"
],
"question": "What narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?"
},
"auditor": {
"priority_fields": [
"anti_linkability",
"refusal_and_non_retaliation",
"federation",
"integrity"
],
"question": "Can recipients correlate presentations, retaliate for refusal, or overstate federation coverage?"
},
"issuer": {
"priority_fields": [
"lineage",
"selective_disclosure",
"anti_linkability",
"accountability"
],
"question": "How do I issue a useful correction without creating a portable identity score?"
},
"recipient": {
"priority_fields": [
"presentation",
"recovery_claim",
"limits",
"revocation"
],
"question": "What may I rely on, for which purpose, until when, and what must I not infer?"
}
},
"schema": "antichrist.cx.standing-recovery-portability-receipt.v1",
"selective_disclosure": {
"disclosed_fields": [
"receipt_id",
"status",
"recovery_claim.plain_language",
"presentation.recipient",
"presentation.purpose",
"presentation.expires_at",
"accountability.human_owner"
],
"minimum_necessary": true,
"original_stigma_disclosed": false,
"private_evidence_disclosed": false,
"withheld_fields": [
"recovery_claim.withheld_facts",
"lineage source payloads",
"private evidence",
"cross-context identifiers"
]
},
"status": "expired_without_use",
"title": "Unused civic-service correction expires without penalty"
}Public design limits
This interface demonstrates an accountable design boundary. It is not legal advice, an identity system, a production credential, proof that a real institution uses these practices, or evidence that selective disclosure alone resolves every power imbalance.