Reduced visual mode. The complete interface stylesheet did not apply. The content remains available; the site operator should run the asset-delivery preflight.

R47 · Human standing recovery

Carry the correction, not the stigma.

A person may prove the narrow correction needed for one decision without exposing the original allegation, becoming linkable across institutions, or carrying a universal certificate of innocence.

  1. 01 · WarningDo not turn prediction into identity.Identify the machine-judgment danger.
  2. 02 · ContestabilityExpose evidence, inference, rule, and owner.Reconstruct the decision path.
  3. 03 · RemedyMake the invalid result stop acting.Execute correction everywhere it traveled.
  4. 04 · Non-RecurrenceVerify that the result cannot quietly return.Stress-test caches, exports, models, and downstream systems.
  5. 05 · Standing RecoveryProve only the correction a new decision needs.Bind disclosure to one recipient and purpose.

Six bounded demonstrations

Choose a recovery situation.

All six receipts are synthetic and fictional. They describe no real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event. Different outcomes—including partial federation, recipient refusal, revocation, and expiry—remain visibly distinct.

SRP-R47-002Accepted With Scope Limit

Education · Fictional receipt

Education standing restored for one scholarship determination

A withdrawn disciplinary inference cannot be used in the named scholarship determination.

Affected person lensWhat narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?
Recipient
Fictional Meridian Scholarship Panel
Purpose
Review one scholarship application without a withdrawn disciplinary inference
Expires
2026-09-06T14:20:00Z
Human owner
Fictional Education Standing Recovery Officer
Replay limit
1 use
Original stigma shown?
No

What authorizes recovery?

Correction lineage

The portable claim is not a free-standing character certificate. It is anchored to the exact contest, remedy, and independent non-recurrence records that precede it.

R44 · ContestabilityCTR-R44-002
R45 · RemedyRMR-R45-002
R46 · Non-RecurrenceNRV-R46-002
R47 · Narrow presentationSRP-R47-002

What may the recipient rely on?

A correction, not an identity.

Bounded recovery claim

A withdrawn disciplinary inference cannot be used in the named scholarship determination.

Subject reference: pairwise:c37e06ec6e3f1b7c057e0606

What this does not establish

  • General character
  • Future conduct
  • Cross-context eligibility
  • A permanent innocence or clearance status

Where is use allowed?

Five bindings prevent a correction from becoming a roaming credential.

RecipientFictional Meridian Scholarship Panel
PurposeReview one scholarship application without a withdrawn disciplinary inference
Validity2026-08-30T14:20:00Z
to
2026-09-06T14:20:00Z
ReplayOne use. No cross-recipient replay.
RevocationHuman-owned and immediately checkable.

What crosses the boundary?

Selective disclosure

The recipient receives the minimum correction facts necessary for the named decision. The original stigma and unrelated evidence stay out of the presentation.

Disclosed

  • The disciplinary inference is withdrawn
  • The scholarship panel must recompute without it
  • The correction applies only to the named review

Withheld

  • Counseling information
  • Original narrative notes
  • Other education records
  • Any universal cleared-person status

Can a person decline?

Refusal cannot become evidence against the person.

Voluntary presentationThe person may decline this presentation and use an equivalent human review path.
Non-retaliationThe recipient may not infer guilt, risk, dishonesty, or ineligibility from non-presentation.

Accountable owner

Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson · Purpose-bound human review request

How far did recovery travel?

Federated result: Bounded Complete

Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.

Meridian intakeAcknowledged

May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.

Meridian panel chairScope Limited

May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.

Can presentations be joined into a dossier?

Anti-linkability checks

Required protections

  • Pairwise recipient reference
  • No stable cross-context identifier
  • No global cleared-person registry
  • No cross-recipient replay
  • No correlation by receipt hash or ID

Checked surfaces

  • Visible fields and URLs
  • Hashes, timestamps, and filenames
  • Accessibility labels and metadata
  • Print output and structured data
  • CSS classes and HTML attributes

What remains unresolved?

Limits remain part of the receipt.

  • Does not erase lawful academic records
  • Does not create a permanent innocence credential
  • Does not compel acceptance outside the named determination

Can the claim be inspected?

Machine-readable record and integrity

These fictional demonstrations expose their contract, state model, presentation rules, predecessor lineage, and deterministic hashes. Technical material is available without dominating the affected person’s reading path.

Integrity hashes
Input SHA-256
fa84599ec876212f30cf88e16bec90f02379ff9f6f0d7fdc2d5ddf1df0404670
Output SHA-256
955c179cfb577c4a3cdda1a1630f8dc2fe9dc159bb3a9c468587a823f3bb1466
Receipt SHA-256
6f98c77df55e02eeebbd9bc37edfd1c8845dbb9ed046f980eab389944369df5a
Complete fictional receipt
{
    "accountability": {
        "audit_owner": "Fictional independent portability auditor",
        "human_owner": "Fictional Education Standing Recovery Officer",
        "issuer": "Fictional Antichrist.cx Accountability Laboratory",
        "recipient_owner": "Fictional Meridian Scholarship Panel human review lead"
    },
    "anti_linkability": {
        "accessibility_labels_contain_subject_identifier": false,
        "correlation_by_hash_prohibited": true,
        "correlation_by_receipt_id_prohibited": true,
        "correlation_by_timestamp_reduced": true,
        "css_or_dom_contains_subject_identifier": false,
        "global_subject_registry": false,
        "pairwise_recipient_reference": true,
        "print_output_contains_hidden_subject_identifier": false,
        "public_url_contains_subject_identifier": false,
        "stable_cross_context_identifier": false,
        "structured_data_contains_subject_identifier": false
    },
    "domain": "education",
    "federation": {
        "coverage_statement": "Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.",
        "participants": [
            {
                "acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:20:00Z",
                "may_retain": [
                    "presentation_receipt_hash",
                    "purpose_binding",
                    "expiry"
                ],
                "must_not_retain": [
                    "original_stigma",
                    "cross_context_person_identifier",
                    "undisclosed_evidence"
                ],
                "name": "Meridian intake",
                "participant_id": "SRP-R47-002-FED-01",
                "state": "acknowledged"
            },
            {
                "acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:20:00Z",
                "may_retain": [
                    "presentation_receipt_hash",
                    "purpose_binding",
                    "expiry"
                ],
                "must_not_retain": [
                    "original_stigma",
                    "cross_context_person_identifier",
                    "undisclosed_evidence"
                ],
                "name": "Meridian panel chair",
                "participant_id": "SRP-R47-002-FED-02",
                "state": "scope_limited"
            }
        ],
        "status": "bounded_complete",
        "unrepresented_as_complete": false
    },
    "fictional": true,
    "fictional_notice": "Synthetic accountable-design demonstration. No real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event is represented.",
    "integrity": {
        "input_sha256": "fa84599ec876212f30cf88e16bec90f02379ff9f6f0d7fdc2d5ddf1df0404670",
        "output_sha256": "955c179cfb577c4a3cdda1a1630f8dc2fe9dc159bb3a9c468587a823f3bb1466",
        "receipt_sha256": "6f98c77df55e02eeebbd9bc37edfd1c8845dbb9ed046f980eab389944369df5a"
    },
    "limits": [
        "Does not erase lawful academic records",
        "Does not create a permanent innocence credential",
        "Does not compel acceptance outside the named determination"
    ],
    "lineage": {
        "contestability": {
            "receipt_id": "CTR-R44-002",
            "receipt_sha256": "8f468419243b1b257bb8723fe3618a3fe7095b7e7c9fb72ce9b74ff75bbc5da2"
        },
        "lineage_complete": true,
        "non_recurrence": {
            "receipt_id": "NRV-R46-002",
            "receipt_sha256": "b6aa92283838d0290fad7bf0f01ed0262ae1ec29cdb2e7ffd2c56b39a7494957"
        },
        "remedy": {
            "receipt_id": "RMR-R45-002",
            "receipt_sha256": "88db9f7c44cc8b73126ee7a6dc48b0718c429eb0fff54edd27e099ed5bf24624"
        }
    },
    "presentation": {
        "audience_binding_sha256": "84d3383d91b62adfbec88a29f22a32676bfef3fec87f00ac668c5309ec59270b",
        "cross_recipient_replay_permitted": false,
        "expires_at": "2026-09-06T14:20:00Z",
        "issued_at": "2026-08-30T14:20:00Z",
        "one_time": true,
        "presentation_id": "PRS-68939C35ADECAF6ED7E1",
        "presentation_status": "accepted_with_scope_limit",
        "purpose": "Review one scholarship application without a withdrawn disciplinary inference",
        "recipient": "Fictional Meridian Scholarship Panel",
        "replay_limit": 1,
        "revocable": true,
        "revocation_reference": "/standing-recovery/receipt?id=SRP-R47-002"
    },
    "receipt_id": "SRP-R47-002",
    "recovery_claim": {
        "claim_type": "narrow_correction",
        "disclosed_facts": [
            "The disciplinary inference is withdrawn",
            "The scholarship panel must recompute without it",
            "The correction applies only to the named review"
        ],
        "does_not_establish": [
            "General character",
            "Future conduct",
            "Cross-context eligibility",
            "A permanent innocence or clearance status"
        ],
        "plain_language": "A withdrawn disciplinary inference cannot be used in the named scholarship determination.",
        "subject_reference": "pairwise:c37e06ec6e3f1b7c057e0606",
        "universal_person_identifier": null,
        "withheld_facts": [
            "Counseling information",
            "Original narrative notes",
            "Other education records",
            "Any universal cleared-person status"
        ]
    },
    "refusal_and_non_retaliation": {
        "adverse_inference_from_refusal_prohibited": true,
        "complaint_channel": "Purpose-bound human review request",
        "equivalent_human_review_available": true,
        "presentation_voluntary": true,
        "refusal_permitted": true,
        "retaliation_owner": "Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson"
    },
    "release": "R47",
    "role_views": {
        "affected_person": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "recovery_claim",
                "presentation",
                "refusal_and_non_retaliation",
                "federation"
            ],
            "question": "What narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?"
        },
        "auditor": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "anti_linkability",
                "refusal_and_non_retaliation",
                "federation",
                "integrity"
            ],
            "question": "Can recipients correlate presentations, retaliate for refusal, or overstate federation coverage?"
        },
        "issuer": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "lineage",
                "selective_disclosure",
                "anti_linkability",
                "accountability"
            ],
            "question": "How do I issue a useful correction without creating a portable identity score?"
        },
        "recipient": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "presentation",
                "recovery_claim",
                "limits",
                "revocation"
            ],
            "question": "What may I rely on, for which purpose, until when, and what must I not infer?"
        }
    },
    "schema": "antichrist.cx.standing-recovery-portability-receipt.v1",
    "selective_disclosure": {
        "disclosed_fields": [
            "receipt_id",
            "status",
            "recovery_claim.plain_language",
            "presentation.recipient",
            "presentation.purpose",
            "presentation.expires_at",
            "accountability.human_owner"
        ],
        "minimum_necessary": true,
        "original_stigma_disclosed": false,
        "private_evidence_disclosed": false,
        "withheld_fields": [
            "recovery_claim.withheld_facts",
            "lineage source payloads",
            "private evidence",
            "cross-context identifiers"
        ]
    },
    "status": "accepted_with_scope_limit",
    "title": "Education standing restored for one scholarship determination"
}
Public design limits

This interface demonstrates an accountable design boundary. It is not legal advice, an identity system, a production credential, proof that a real institution uses these practices, or evidence that selective disclosure alone resolves every power imbalance.