Housing · Fictional receipt
Housing correction presented without replayable identity linkage
A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.
- Recipient
- Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative
- Purpose
- Correct one pending housing eligibility review
- Expires
- 2026-09-13T14:00:00Z
- Human owner
- Fictional Housing Standing Recovery Officer
- Replay limit
- 1 use
- Original stigma shown?
- No
What authorizes recovery?
Correction lineage
The portable claim is not a free-standing character certificate. It is anchored to the exact contest, remedy, and independent non-recurrence records that precede it.
What may the recipient rely on?
A correction, not an identity.
Bounded recovery claim
A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.
Subject reference: pairwise:ac5abce1e7e36d61de327868
What this does not establish
- General character
- Future conduct
- Cross-context eligibility
- A permanent innocence or clearance status
Where is use allowed?
Five bindings prevent a correction from becoming a roaming credential.
to
2026-09-13T14:00:00Z
What crosses the boundary?
Selective disclosure
The recipient receives the minimum correction facts necessary for the named decision. The original stigma and unrelated evidence stay out of the presentation.
Disclosed
- The prior hold is withdrawn
- The corrected eligibility review must exclude the withdrawn hold
- A human reviewer owns the corrected decision
Withheld
- The original allegation text
- Unrelated case history
- A cross-context person identifier
- The underlying private evidence record
Can a person decline?
Refusal cannot become evidence against the person.
Accountable owner
Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson · Purpose-bound human review request
How far did recovery travel?
Federated result: Bounded Complete
Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.
May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.
May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.
Can presentations be joined into a dossier?
Anti-linkability checks
Required protections
- Pairwise recipient reference
- No stable cross-context identifier
- No global cleared-person registry
- No cross-recipient replay
- No correlation by receipt hash or ID
Checked surfaces
- Visible fields and URLs
- Hashes, timestamps, and filenames
- Accessibility labels and metadata
- Print output and structured data
- CSS classes and HTML attributes
What remains unresolved?
Limits remain part of the receipt.
- Does not prove general trustworthiness
- Does not authorize reuse in another application
- Does not reveal the withdrawn allegation
Can the claim be inspected?
Machine-readable record and integrity
These fictional demonstrations expose their contract, state model, presentation rules, predecessor lineage, and deterministic hashes. Technical material is available without dominating the affected person’s reading path.
Integrity hashes
- Input SHA-256
- 277f5be47d39dec7bf3122515dee7be1178d2b2ef19263f78bb73cc250244d84
- Output SHA-256
- fb3a1cf8b4b6355edc7f3e197767820b1f7e7c8993cdeb9b44da468d5fa5c68b
- Receipt SHA-256
- 057ee00078e0f45d2a10c9e177d01388cecf317a17a73a5f8bafb416e23dc7c5
Complete fictional receipt
{
"accountability": {
"audit_owner": "Fictional independent portability auditor",
"human_owner": "Fictional Housing Standing Recovery Officer",
"issuer": "Fictional Antichrist.cx Accountability Laboratory",
"recipient_owner": "Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative human review lead"
},
"anti_linkability": {
"accessibility_labels_contain_subject_identifier": false,
"correlation_by_hash_prohibited": true,
"correlation_by_receipt_id_prohibited": true,
"correlation_by_timestamp_reduced": true,
"css_or_dom_contains_subject_identifier": false,
"global_subject_registry": false,
"pairwise_recipient_reference": true,
"print_output_contains_hidden_subject_identifier": false,
"public_url_contains_subject_identifier": false,
"stable_cross_context_identifier": false,
"structured_data_contains_subject_identifier": false
},
"domain": "housing",
"federation": {
"coverage_statement": "Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.",
"participants": [
{
"acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
"may_retain": [
"presentation_receipt_hash",
"purpose_binding",
"expiry"
],
"must_not_retain": [
"original_stigma",
"cross_context_person_identifier",
"undisclosed_evidence"
],
"name": "Northbridge review desk",
"participant_id": "SRP-R47-001-FED-01",
"state": "acknowledged"
},
{
"acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
"may_retain": [
"presentation_receipt_hash",
"purpose_binding",
"expiry"
],
"must_not_retain": [
"original_stigma",
"cross_context_person_identifier",
"undisclosed_evidence"
],
"name": "Northbridge decision owner",
"participant_id": "SRP-R47-001-FED-02",
"state": "acknowledged"
}
],
"status": "bounded_complete",
"unrepresented_as_complete": false
},
"fictional": true,
"fictional_notice": "Synthetic accountable-design demonstration. No real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event is represented.",
"integrity": {
"input_sha256": "277f5be47d39dec7bf3122515dee7be1178d2b2ef19263f78bb73cc250244d84",
"output_sha256": "fb3a1cf8b4b6355edc7f3e197767820b1f7e7c8993cdeb9b44da468d5fa5c68b",
"receipt_sha256": "057ee00078e0f45d2a10c9e177d01388cecf317a17a73a5f8bafb416e23dc7c5"
},
"limits": [
"Does not prove general trustworthiness",
"Does not authorize reuse in another application",
"Does not reveal the withdrawn allegation"
],
"lineage": {
"contestability": {
"receipt_id": "CTR-R44-001",
"receipt_sha256": "3d82ff179a846a7bf984c964032dcd90bdcf4b53bb1331c80b3288273cf7edae"
},
"lineage_complete": true,
"non_recurrence": {
"receipt_id": "NRV-R46-001",
"receipt_sha256": "e4568d52f1427f29e8787d353eadeda259ba60f2e6834c3603cce62300b222b4"
},
"remedy": {
"receipt_id": "RMR-R45-001",
"receipt_sha256": "0c9efbc407d928224f1490de26af948b1380d3049906e72f24eae01072fc0a0f"
}
},
"presentation": {
"audience_binding_sha256": "a412b7a938d564613f2debfe7e828a0428bdace2846ae5e81ccf23c5cb9e658a",
"cross_recipient_replay_permitted": false,
"expires_at": "2026-09-13T14:00:00Z",
"issued_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
"one_time": true,
"presentation_id": "PRS-699ABB8EF8B264019A2C",
"presentation_status": "accepted",
"purpose": "Correct one pending housing eligibility review",
"recipient": "Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative",
"replay_limit": 1,
"revocable": true,
"revocation_reference": "/standing-recovery/receipt?id=SRP-R47-001"
},
"receipt_id": "SRP-R47-001",
"recovery_claim": {
"claim_type": "narrow_correction",
"disclosed_facts": [
"The prior hold is withdrawn",
"The corrected eligibility review must exclude the withdrawn hold",
"A human reviewer owns the corrected decision"
],
"does_not_establish": [
"General character",
"Future conduct",
"Cross-context eligibility",
"A permanent innocence or clearance status"
],
"plain_language": "A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.",
"subject_reference": "pairwise:ac5abce1e7e36d61de327868",
"universal_person_identifier": null,
"withheld_facts": [
"The original allegation text",
"Unrelated case history",
"A cross-context person identifier",
"The underlying private evidence record"
]
},
"refusal_and_non_retaliation": {
"adverse_inference_from_refusal_prohibited": true,
"complaint_channel": "Purpose-bound human review request",
"equivalent_human_review_available": true,
"presentation_voluntary": true,
"refusal_permitted": true,
"retaliation_owner": "Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson"
},
"release": "R47",
"role_views": {
"affected_person": {
"priority_fields": [
"recovery_claim",
"presentation",
"refusal_and_non_retaliation",
"federation"
],
"question": "What narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?"
},
"auditor": {
"priority_fields": [
"anti_linkability",
"refusal_and_non_retaliation",
"federation",
"integrity"
],
"question": "Can recipients correlate presentations, retaliate for refusal, or overstate federation coverage?"
},
"issuer": {
"priority_fields": [
"lineage",
"selective_disclosure",
"anti_linkability",
"accountability"
],
"question": "How do I issue a useful correction without creating a portable identity score?"
},
"recipient": {
"priority_fields": [
"presentation",
"recovery_claim",
"limits",
"revocation"
],
"question": "What may I rely on, for which purpose, until when, and what must I not infer?"
}
},
"schema": "antichrist.cx.standing-recovery-portability-receipt.v1",
"selective_disclosure": {
"disclosed_fields": [
"receipt_id",
"status",
"recovery_claim.plain_language",
"presentation.recipient",
"presentation.purpose",
"presentation.expires_at",
"accountability.human_owner"
],
"minimum_necessary": true,
"original_stigma_disclosed": false,
"private_evidence_disclosed": false,
"withheld_fields": [
"recovery_claim.withheld_facts",
"lineage source payloads",
"private evidence",
"cross-context identifiers"
]
},
"status": "accepted",
"title": "Housing correction presented without replayable identity linkage"
}Public design limits
This interface demonstrates an accountable design boundary. It is not legal advice, an identity system, a production credential, proof that a real institution uses these practices, or evidence that selective disclosure alone resolves every power imbalance.