Reduced visual mode. The complete interface stylesheet did not apply. The content remains available; the site operator should run the asset-delivery preflight.

R47 · Human standing recovery

Carry the correction, not the stigma.

A person may prove the narrow correction needed for one decision without exposing the original allegation, becoming linkable across institutions, or carrying a universal certificate of innocence.

  1. 01 · WarningDo not turn prediction into identity.Identify the machine-judgment danger.
  2. 02 · ContestabilityExpose evidence, inference, rule, and owner.Reconstruct the decision path.
  3. 03 · RemedyMake the invalid result stop acting.Execute correction everywhere it traveled.
  4. 04 · Non-RecurrenceVerify that the result cannot quietly return.Stress-test caches, exports, models, and downstream systems.
  5. 05 · Standing RecoveryProve only the correction a new decision needs.Bind disclosure to one recipient and purpose.

Six bounded demonstrations

Choose a recovery situation.

All six receipts are synthetic and fictional. They describe no real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event. Different outcomes—including partial federation, recipient refusal, revocation, and expiry—remain visibly distinct.

SRP-R47-001Accepted

Housing · Fictional receipt

Housing correction presented without replayable identity linkage

A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.

Affected person lensWhat narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?
Recipient
Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative
Purpose
Correct one pending housing eligibility review
Expires
2026-09-13T14:00:00Z
Human owner
Fictional Housing Standing Recovery Officer
Replay limit
1 use
Original stigma shown?
No

What authorizes recovery?

Correction lineage

The portable claim is not a free-standing character certificate. It is anchored to the exact contest, remedy, and independent non-recurrence records that precede it.

R44 · ContestabilityCTR-R44-001
R45 · RemedyRMR-R45-001
R46 · Non-RecurrenceNRV-R46-001
R47 · Narrow presentationSRP-R47-001

What may the recipient rely on?

A correction, not an identity.

Bounded recovery claim

A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.

Subject reference: pairwise:ac5abce1e7e36d61de327868

What this does not establish

  • General character
  • Future conduct
  • Cross-context eligibility
  • A permanent innocence or clearance status

Where is use allowed?

Five bindings prevent a correction from becoming a roaming credential.

RecipientFictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative
PurposeCorrect one pending housing eligibility review
Validity2026-08-30T14:00:00Z
to
2026-09-13T14:00:00Z
ReplayOne use. No cross-recipient replay.
RevocationHuman-owned and immediately checkable.

What crosses the boundary?

Selective disclosure

The recipient receives the minimum correction facts necessary for the named decision. The original stigma and unrelated evidence stay out of the presentation.

Disclosed

  • The prior hold is withdrawn
  • The corrected eligibility review must exclude the withdrawn hold
  • A human reviewer owns the corrected decision

Withheld

  • The original allegation text
  • Unrelated case history
  • A cross-context person identifier
  • The underlying private evidence record

Can a person decline?

Refusal cannot become evidence against the person.

Voluntary presentationThe person may decline this presentation and use an equivalent human review path.
Non-retaliationThe recipient may not infer guilt, risk, dishonesty, or ineligibility from non-presentation.

Accountable owner

Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson · Purpose-bound human review request

How far did recovery travel?

Federated result: Bounded Complete

Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.

Northbridge review deskAcknowledged

May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.

Northbridge decision ownerAcknowledged

May retain: presentation_receipt_hash, purpose_binding, expiry. Must not retain: original_stigma, cross_context_person_identifier, undisclosed_evidence.

Can presentations be joined into a dossier?

Anti-linkability checks

Required protections

  • Pairwise recipient reference
  • No stable cross-context identifier
  • No global cleared-person registry
  • No cross-recipient replay
  • No correlation by receipt hash or ID

Checked surfaces

  • Visible fields and URLs
  • Hashes, timestamps, and filenames
  • Accessibility labels and metadata
  • Print output and structured data
  • CSS classes and HTML attributes

What remains unresolved?

Limits remain part of the receipt.

  • Does not prove general trustworthiness
  • Does not authorize reuse in another application
  • Does not reveal the withdrawn allegation

Can the claim be inspected?

Machine-readable record and integrity

These fictional demonstrations expose their contract, state model, presentation rules, predecessor lineage, and deterministic hashes. Technical material is available without dominating the affected person’s reading path.

Integrity hashes
Input SHA-256
277f5be47d39dec7bf3122515dee7be1178d2b2ef19263f78bb73cc250244d84
Output SHA-256
fb3a1cf8b4b6355edc7f3e197767820b1f7e7c8993cdeb9b44da468d5fa5c68b
Receipt SHA-256
057ee00078e0f45d2a10c9e177d01388cecf317a17a73a5f8bafb416e23dc7c5
Complete fictional receipt
{
    "accountability": {
        "audit_owner": "Fictional independent portability auditor",
        "human_owner": "Fictional Housing Standing Recovery Officer",
        "issuer": "Fictional Antichrist.cx Accountability Laboratory",
        "recipient_owner": "Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative human review lead"
    },
    "anti_linkability": {
        "accessibility_labels_contain_subject_identifier": false,
        "correlation_by_hash_prohibited": true,
        "correlation_by_receipt_id_prohibited": true,
        "correlation_by_timestamp_reduced": true,
        "css_or_dom_contains_subject_identifier": false,
        "global_subject_registry": false,
        "pairwise_recipient_reference": true,
        "print_output_contains_hidden_subject_identifier": false,
        "public_url_contains_subject_identifier": false,
        "stable_cross_context_identifier": false,
        "structured_data_contains_subject_identifier": false
    },
    "domain": "housing",
    "federation": {
        "coverage_statement": "Coverage is limited to the explicitly named participants and purpose.",
        "participants": [
            {
                "acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
                "may_retain": [
                    "presentation_receipt_hash",
                    "purpose_binding",
                    "expiry"
                ],
                "must_not_retain": [
                    "original_stigma",
                    "cross_context_person_identifier",
                    "undisclosed_evidence"
                ],
                "name": "Northbridge review desk",
                "participant_id": "SRP-R47-001-FED-01",
                "state": "acknowledged"
            },
            {
                "acknowledged_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
                "may_retain": [
                    "presentation_receipt_hash",
                    "purpose_binding",
                    "expiry"
                ],
                "must_not_retain": [
                    "original_stigma",
                    "cross_context_person_identifier",
                    "undisclosed_evidence"
                ],
                "name": "Northbridge decision owner",
                "participant_id": "SRP-R47-001-FED-02",
                "state": "acknowledged"
            }
        ],
        "status": "bounded_complete",
        "unrepresented_as_complete": false
    },
    "fictional": true,
    "fictional_notice": "Synthetic accountable-design demonstration. No real person, institution, allegation, credential, or event is represented.",
    "integrity": {
        "input_sha256": "277f5be47d39dec7bf3122515dee7be1178d2b2ef19263f78bb73cc250244d84",
        "output_sha256": "fb3a1cf8b4b6355edc7f3e197767820b1f7e7c8993cdeb9b44da468d5fa5c68b",
        "receipt_sha256": "057ee00078e0f45d2a10c9e177d01388cecf317a17a73a5f8bafb416e23dc7c5"
    },
    "limits": [
        "Does not prove general trustworthiness",
        "Does not authorize reuse in another application",
        "Does not reveal the withdrawn allegation"
    ],
    "lineage": {
        "contestability": {
            "receipt_id": "CTR-R44-001",
            "receipt_sha256": "3d82ff179a846a7bf984c964032dcd90bdcf4b53bb1331c80b3288273cf7edae"
        },
        "lineage_complete": true,
        "non_recurrence": {
            "receipt_id": "NRV-R46-001",
            "receipt_sha256": "e4568d52f1427f29e8787d353eadeda259ba60f2e6834c3603cce62300b222b4"
        },
        "remedy": {
            "receipt_id": "RMR-R45-001",
            "receipt_sha256": "0c9efbc407d928224f1490de26af948b1380d3049906e72f24eae01072fc0a0f"
        }
    },
    "presentation": {
        "audience_binding_sha256": "a412b7a938d564613f2debfe7e828a0428bdace2846ae5e81ccf23c5cb9e658a",
        "cross_recipient_replay_permitted": false,
        "expires_at": "2026-09-13T14:00:00Z",
        "issued_at": "2026-08-30T14:00:00Z",
        "one_time": true,
        "presentation_id": "PRS-699ABB8EF8B264019A2C",
        "presentation_status": "accepted",
        "purpose": "Correct one pending housing eligibility review",
        "recipient": "Fictional Northbridge Housing Review Cooperative",
        "replay_limit": 1,
        "revocable": true,
        "revocation_reference": "/standing-recovery/receipt?id=SRP-R47-001"
    },
    "receipt_id": "SRP-R47-001",
    "recovery_claim": {
        "claim_type": "narrow_correction",
        "disclosed_facts": [
            "The prior hold is withdrawn",
            "The corrected eligibility review must exclude the withdrawn hold",
            "A human reviewer owns the corrected decision"
        ],
        "does_not_establish": [
            "General character",
            "Future conduct",
            "Cross-context eligibility",
            "A permanent innocence or clearance status"
        ],
        "plain_language": "A prior eligibility hold was withdrawn and may not be used in this one pending housing review.",
        "subject_reference": "pairwise:ac5abce1e7e36d61de327868",
        "universal_person_identifier": null,
        "withheld_facts": [
            "The original allegation text",
            "Unrelated case history",
            "A cross-context person identifier",
            "The underlying private evidence record"
        ]
    },
    "refusal_and_non_retaliation": {
        "adverse_inference_from_refusal_prohibited": true,
        "complaint_channel": "Purpose-bound human review request",
        "equivalent_human_review_available": true,
        "presentation_voluntary": true,
        "refusal_permitted": true,
        "retaliation_owner": "Fictional standing-recovery ombudsperson"
    },
    "release": "R47",
    "role_views": {
        "affected_person": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "recovery_claim",
                "presentation",
                "refusal_and_non_retaliation",
                "federation"
            ],
            "question": "What narrow correction can I present, what stays private, and what happens if I decline?"
        },
        "auditor": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "anti_linkability",
                "refusal_and_non_retaliation",
                "federation",
                "integrity"
            ],
            "question": "Can recipients correlate presentations, retaliate for refusal, or overstate federation coverage?"
        },
        "issuer": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "lineage",
                "selective_disclosure",
                "anti_linkability",
                "accountability"
            ],
            "question": "How do I issue a useful correction without creating a portable identity score?"
        },
        "recipient": {
            "priority_fields": [
                "presentation",
                "recovery_claim",
                "limits",
                "revocation"
            ],
            "question": "What may I rely on, for which purpose, until when, and what must I not infer?"
        }
    },
    "schema": "antichrist.cx.standing-recovery-portability-receipt.v1",
    "selective_disclosure": {
        "disclosed_fields": [
            "receipt_id",
            "status",
            "recovery_claim.plain_language",
            "presentation.recipient",
            "presentation.purpose",
            "presentation.expires_at",
            "accountability.human_owner"
        ],
        "minimum_necessary": true,
        "original_stigma_disclosed": false,
        "private_evidence_disclosed": false,
        "withheld_fields": [
            "recovery_claim.withheld_facts",
            "lineage source payloads",
            "private evidence",
            "cross-context identifiers"
        ]
    },
    "status": "accepted",
    "title": "Housing correction presented without replayable identity linkage"
}
Public design limits

This interface demonstrates an accountable design boundary. It is not legal advice, an identity system, a production credential, proof that a real institution uses these practices, or evidence that selective disclosure alone resolves every power imbalance.